Nevertheless, the mechanisms underlying alcohol-related cancer development remain largely unclear. To estimate the effect of alcohol consumption on the risk for each type of cancer studied, based on the pooled data from all studies included in the meta-analysis, the investigators used meta-regression models—statistical models developed specifically for such analyses (Corrao et al. 1999, 2000). For a more detailed description of these statistical analyses, see the textbox, p. 265, and the articles by Corrao and colleagues (1999, 2000). Alcohol usage particularly increases the risk for colorectal, liver, stomach, breast, head, neck, and throat cancers. An estimated 1 in 20 cancers in the U.S. were attributed to alcohol use in 2019, the report stated, noting that starting drinking at an early age increases cancer risk later in life.
Researchers of tobacco, alcohol and ultra-processed foods face threats and intimidation: New study
For example, the analysis was unable to identify a threshold level of alcohol consumption below which no increased risk for cancer is evident. Furthermore, this meta-analysis found that the association of alcohol with the risk for oral and pharyngeal cancer appears to be stronger than the association with esophageal or laryngeal cancer across increasing levels of alcohol intake. To determine the effects of alcohol on the risk for various types of cancer, the researchers used three statistical methods. Subsequently, they determined the relationship between alcohol consumption and the risk for a given type of cancer by fitting to the pooled data several statistical models called fractional models (Royston et al. 1999). Such models can identify trends (e.g., J- or U-shaped curves) as well as other relationships between alcohol exposure levels and relative risks. The investigators then chose the best-fitting model to summarize the relation of interest (Corrao et al. 1999).
Cardiovascular Diseases
- For example, when the investigators considered only studies reporting RRs not adjusted for tobacco use, the pooled RR for lung cancer at the highest level of alcohol consumption was 6.30.
- Blue dotted lines indicate 95-percent confidence intervals; that is, the range of RR that is 95 percent likely to show a true RR.
- They also looked at the effect of adjusting the reported estimates for smoking when examining tobacco-related types of cancer.
- The acute effects of alcohol consumption on injury risk are mediated by how regularly the individual drinks.
Using blood tests to get a more accurate estimate of true alcohol consumption could also benefit future research, wrote Amy Justice, M.D., Ph.D., of Yale University, in an accompanying editorial. “The sooner we start accurately measuring alcohol exposure, the sooner we can understand the true excess burden of cancer attributable to alcohol and effectively intervene,” Dr. Justice wrote. Breast cancer in women came in third place for number of cases, with almost 100,000 cases (about 4% worldwide) attributable to alcohol use.
Article Information
In terms of risk assessment, this meta-analysis confirms that high levels of alcohol consumption (i.e., more than four drinks per day) result in a substantial risk of cancer development at several sites. At the same time, other studies have shown that moderate alcohol consumption can have protective effects against certain types of heart disease. Accordingly, one must determine whether moderate alcohol consumption results in an overall favorable or unfavorable risk-benefit balance for the individual drinker or an entire population. This balance depends on the age, gender, and baseline disease rates among the members of a given population. Consequently, any definite risk-benefit assessment for moderate alcohol drinking requires much more far-reaching analyses that are beyond the scope of this article but that in the future may provide important information from a public health perspective. The overall effect of alcohol consumption on the global cardiovascular disease burden is detrimental (see table 2).
“This is a reminder of the impact of lifestyle choices that can have on cancer risk,” Harb said. “With these things in mind, there’s a lot we can do for any individual at the risk of developing cancer — it’s really important to detect early or prevent it in the first place, so we don’t deal with advanced cancer situations,” he emphasized. The estimates of cancer cases attributed to alcohol may have been higher if past consumption had been accounted for, Dr. Abnet said. The WHO researchers also created an interactive website where people can explore the results by country, cancer site, and other variables. The number of individual studies does not add up to the total shown because several studies examined more than one type of cancer.
You input information about yourself and your alcohol behaviors, and it gives you personalized feedback. That might be helpful for people going into the holidays wondering how their alcohol use compares to averages. It can also offer personalized help to people looking to reduce their alcohol consumption. ”While I don’t think that this report provides all of the answers, it is certainly a step in the right direction. More importantly, if we better understand cancer risk factors, this allows us to more effectively counsel our patients about behaviors that will ultimately help to prevent cancer diagnoses,” she added.
There is substantial evidence that alcohol consumption can cause unprovoked seizures, and researchers have identified plausible biological pathways that may underlie this relationship (Samokhvalov et al. 2010a). Most of the relevant studies found that a high percentage of heavy alcohol users with epilepsy meet the criteria of alcohol dependence. The NCI Alcohol and Cancer Risk Fact Sheet provides a broad overview of alcohol as a risk factor for cancer, and three recent papers explore Division interest in alcohol awareness (7,8) and research needs related to alcohol and cancer prevention and control (9).
Such analyses were conducted for most cancers of the upper airways and digestive tract, as well as for lung and bladder cancer. These analyses found that tobacco use had a substantial modifying effect not only on the alcohol-related risks for lung and bladder cancer but also on the risk for laryngeal cancer. For example, when the investigators considered only studies reporting RRs not adjusted for tobacco use, the pooled RR for lung cancer at the highest level of alcohol consumption was 6.30.
It likely plays an important role in the development of cancers of the digestive tract, especially those of the upper digestive tract (Lachenmeier et al. 2009; Seitz and Becker 2007). Alcohol use is not independent of other risk factors, therefore research projects addressing hope house boston alcohol as a target for cancer prevention and control should consider a multi-behavioral framework along with multilevel influences on alcohol use. Where appropriate, investigators should consider co-occurrence of alcohol use with other cancer-related behavioral risk factors (e.g., tobacco use, sun exposure, physical activity, sleep disturbances) when designing interventions.
The remaining third were sources like blogs, newspaper articles, news stories in peer-reviewed journals, a case study, a press release, a recorded seminar and a book. When the COVID-19 pandemic forced much of the world to shut down, and many days seemed bleak, it was easy to joke about the allure of a splash of rum in a morning coffee, or a cold beer at the end of the day. In the case of an ischemic stroke, this is caused by blockage of a blood vessel that prevents the blood from reaching neighboring brain areas. In the case of a hemorrhagic stroke, rupture of a blood vessel and bleeding into the brain occurs, which prevents normal blood supply to other brain regions.